Comments on: Beer Update https://wolfhusky.net/duncan/wp/2004/07/beer-update/ My little corner of the web Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:01:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: woofwoofarf https://wolfhusky.net/duncan/wp/2004/07/beer-update/#comment-1747 Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:01:09 +0000 http://woofwoofarf.wordpress.com/2004/07/22/beer-update/#comment-1747 In reply to me_not_you.

I would trust your numbers more – I think the ones I used were a back-of-the-envelope kind of thing:
%Wt = 105 * (OG – FG)
%Vol = 1.25 * %Wt
Doing a quick analysis in Excel (because I’m a geek), I see that the formulae I used are most accurate in the range of typical alcohol concentrations – 5-6% by volume. Your calculations are better suited for a wider range of alcohol concentrations.

]]> By: me_not_you https://wolfhusky.net/duncan/wp/2004/07/beer-update/#comment-1746 Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:09:09 +0000 http://woofwoofarf.wordpress.com/2004/07/22/beer-update/#comment-1746 Ok, I get different numbers 🙁
Formulas Used from:
http://www.realbeer.com/library/beerbreak/archives/beerbreak0301.php
ABW = 76.08( OG – FG )/( 1.775 – OG )
ABV = ABW( FG / .794 )
Which when I plug in the numbers gets me
ABW = 7.518
ABV = 9.752
Am I using the wrong formulas?

]]> By: loopter https://wolfhusky.net/duncan/wp/2004/07/beer-update/#comment-1745 Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:47:01 +0000 http://woofwoofarf.wordpress.com/2004/07/22/beer-update/#comment-1745 Dude..I wanna try some of this..even though I am not 21 I still wantn try!

]]> By: jarrodhenry https://wolfhusky.net/duncan/wp/2004/07/beer-update/#comment-1744 Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:53:58 +0000 http://woofwoofarf.wordpress.com/2004/07/22/beer-update/#comment-1744 Holycows! at that FG-OG … You’re going to end up probably adding another 2 to 3% in the conditioning, right? Ooooh.. I so much want a bottle of this 🙂

]]>